The exponential growth of the NFT sector has been one of the most remarkable stories in the crypto space over recent years. Some emphasize its cultural significance, while others view it primarily as a financial product. There are also those who believe that the emergence and flourishing of NFTs signify a pathway to mapping real-world assets onto the blockchain.
This article delves into one of the most certain and substantial opportunities within the NFT ecosystem—the NFT marketplace. We will explore the current competitive landscape and core moats, analyze the development of Blur—the most talked-about emerging platform in the past year—and examine the achievements and challenges embedded in its airdrop strategy.
The Competitive Environment of NFT Marketplaces
Due to the low switching costs for suppliers and the pursuit of higher trading volume, numerous NFT marketplaces have emerged. They can be broadly divided into two categories: general marketplaces and vertical-specific platforms. General marketplaces cover a wide range of NFT categories, while vertical platforms focus on specific niches, such as gaming or curated NFT collections.
The most popular general NFT marketplace is OpenSea, with competitors like Rarible, Mintable, and Coinbase vying for market share. The differences among these general NFT marketplaces are reflected in:
1. Ease of Discovering New Projects
Currently, Twitter and Discord serve as the primary platforms for discovering new NFT projects. By improving display interfaces and search functionality, marketplaces can enhance the discoverability of new (and high-quality) projects, thereby increasing user engagement and retention.
2. Integration of SaaS Tools and Feature Completeness
At present, OpenSea and its competitors resemble front-end products that are user-friendly but not yet fully mature. By incorporating additional features—such as NFT portfolio management tools, simplified minting tools for creators, and richer social functions—marketplaces can lock in users and increase their switching costs.
3. Reputation and Brand Recognition
In the crypto world, “trusted” platforms are rare. OpenSea’s most significant advantage over its competitors stems from its established reputation. As a result, project teams regularly share their OpenSea links on Discord channels and Twitter profiles, reinforcing this reputation-based moat.
Vertical marketplaces are represented by platforms like Foundation, SuperRare, and Immutable. Each specializes in a particular vertical; for example, Immutable focuses on GameFi, while SuperRare emphasizes works by renowned artists.
The strength of vertical platforms lies in their ability to help buyers cut through the noise and find exactly what they want. They prioritize user needs and experience, often employing a “curated” strategy to highlight high-quality projects. For instance, Gemini’s Nifty Gateway regularly hosts such events to showcase unique NFT series.
The landscape of NFT marketplaces is far from mature. The asset class itself is still nascent, and there remains vast room for innovation in platform functionality. We can draw parallels with traditional Web2 general and vertical marketplaces to understand the potential evolution of NFT trading platforms.
In essence, general platforms like OpenSea aim to monetize a large user base through a unified product experience, with the ultimate goal of maximizing user acquisition and traffic. Vertical platforms, on the other hand, tailor personalized experiences for high-value users, securing their place by serving a smaller but more dedicated clientele over the long term. This explains why high-value NFTs are often favored on vertical platforms.
Five Key Moats of NFT Marketplaces
Marketplaces have existed in some form since the dawn of human society—only the mediums of exchange have evolved. They operate across industries, communities, and social strata, but several key characteristics are universal.
1. Trading Volume
A successful marketplace must attract attention and facilitate sufficient trading volume for its participants. This is common in categories with high-frequency trading behaviors, such as daily necessities. In the crypto world, many trading activities are driven by speculation, making high-frequency trading a natural fit.
2. Discoverability
Efficient search and discovery mechanisms can significantly boost trading volume on a platform. This not only increases customer lifetime value but also reduces user churn through a smooth search and purchase experience. Currently, general NFT marketplaces are actively improving in this area.
3. User Experience
For users of NFT marketplaces, the trading process can be broken down into several steps: discovery, decision-making, listing or bidding, fulfillment rate, trading frequency, and transaction costs. The best marketplaces optimize each of these steps for both buyers and sellers, including user-friendly payment methods, problem-resolution capabilities, and interfaces that appeal to a broad audience.
So far, the user experience on general NFT marketplaces has been somewhat lacking. OpenSea has long functioned more like a minimalist front-end product. To address practical trading issues, marketplaces need to innovate boldly. We will detail Blur’s “trader-friendly” features later to illustrate how it offers a refreshing alternative to OpenSea.
4. Economic Incentives
Successful marketplaces deliver economic value to both buyers and sellers, ideally offering advantages over existing methods, such as cost savings or platform incentives. For sellers, this stimulates demand and increases revenue; for buyers, it effectively reduces costs.
NFT marketplaces have unique characteristics. Due to innovations in ownership structures and the advent of tokenization strategies in Web3, these platforms can not only create traditional economic value but also further incentivize user engagement and retention through methods like token issuance.
5. Multi-Chain Aggregation
Users have long been frustrated by the fragmentation of trading platforms. In the NFT space, the multi-chain ecosystem has led to excessive market fragmentation, making transactions less convenient. Even today, purchasing NFTs on Ethereum, Solana, Tezos, or Avalanche often requires different platforms, wallets, and even currencies—hardly conducive to a seamless user experience.
Blur: The Disruptive Newcomer
As a community-driven NFT marketplace designed specifically for traders, Blur stands out. It aggregates orders from platforms like OpenSea, LooksRare, and X2Y2, while allowing users to list their NFT assets directly on Blur. Unlike other platforms that charge transaction fees, Blur currently maintains a 0% fee structure.
Before its official launch, the platform generated significant buzz through invite-only registrations, referral reward programs, and a waitlist. Its early product-market fit can be attributed to three key factors:
1. Ease of Use
By default, NFTs are sorted by daily trading volume, and all key data—such as floor price, number of owners, and various trading indicators—are displayed at a glance. Users can easily track and analyze an NFT’s rarity, collection value, and even rough investment returns.
Blur’s interface is highly customizable. When browsing NFT collections, users can switch between multiple views according to their preferences. Unlike OpenSea, which requires complex tab switching to view sales history or other analytical metrics, Blur displays everything on a single page. Additional features, such as dark/light mode and gas fee trackers, further distinguish it from other platforms.
That said, newcomers might find Blur’s data-rich interface intimidating. It has been compared to a Bloomberg terminal, requiring some time for exploration and adaptation. But for those willing to invest the effort, the benefits over other NFT marketplaces are evident.
2. Functional Innovation
A great user experience is built on a foundation of useful and appropriately innovative features. Blur promises sweeping speeds ten times faster than other platforms, lightning-fast pending transaction displays, and near-instant data updates—features that are hard to resist for active traders.
Additionally, Blur clearly displays the rarity of different traits within the same collection and even allows users to see the floor price for specific attributes. By identifying the lowest-priced orders for each trait and presenting the data intuitively, this feature helps users accurately assess their assets and is particularly useful for those seeking NFTs with specific properties.
Blur’s “sweeping” tool caters to the needs of professional traders. Every NFT collection includes a depth chart showing how many NFTs are listed at various intervals above the floor price, helping users visualize how their purchases might impact the market.
One functional shortcoming is that Blur currently supports only Ethereum-based NFTs. However, the Blur team has announced plans to integrate other chains, such as Polygon, in the future.
3. Strong Backing and Support
In March 2022, Blur raised $11 million in a seed round led by Paradigm. As one of the most successful venture capital firms in crypto, Paradigm’s investment in Blur is significant. The firm has previously backed many winners in the NFT space, including OpenSea and Magic Eden.
The funding round also attracted other key players in the NFT and crypto communities, such as 0xMaki, Andy Chorlian, Santiago Roel Santos, Deeze, and Zeneca. Support from these influencers indicates that Blur has a solid community foundation and the ability to attract a tight-knit group of industry enthusiasts.
Beyond its reputable investors, Blur’s founding team is also impressive. The founder, known as Pacman, recently revealed his identity: he started his first venture at 17, was accepted into the prestigious Y Combinator accelerator, later attended MIT, received a Peter Thiel fellowship, and founded a company called Namebase, which was acquired by Namecheap. Such a profile adds considerable credibility to the project.
According to Blur, team members hail from institutions like MIT, Citadel, Twitch, Brex, Square, and Y Combinator. This level of experience enhances the project’s reputation and execution capabilities.
Achievements and Concerns Around Blur’s Airdrop Strategy
As mentioned, a wide selection of assets and a user-friendly experience are foundational for any NFT marketplace aiming to capture market share. Blur’s speed advantages and unique features form important moats. Thanks to these, 65% of Blur’s early users migrated from OpenSea and Gem.
But Blur didn’t stop there. It effectively leveraged one of crypto’s most powerful tools—token airdrops—to further challenge OpenSea.
OpenSea, launched in December 2017, has dominated the NFT industry for years, accumulating substantial experience and resources. Facing such a formidable opponent, how did Blur manage to catch up and even surpass OpenSea in trading volume so quickly?
Blur understood that airdrops could help achieve this short-term goal.
It adopted a sophisticated approach, dividing the airdrop into three rounds:
- Round 1: Users who had traded NFTs in the past six months
- Round 2: Users who actively listed NFTs on Blur
- Round 3: Users who placed bids on Blur
Additionally, according to Blur’s blog posts, users who respected royalty payments (rather than setting them to zero) received more airdropped tokens. User loyalty also influenced airdrop amounts; to maintain high loyalty, users were required to list NFTs on Blur at prices equal to or lower than those on other platforms.
This strategy led to tactical victories. Under Blur’s aggressive campaign, OpenSea’s market share fell from a peak of 99% last year to between 50% and 30% early this year.
However, success driven solely by airdrops is often temporary. The experiences of LooksRare and X2Y2 demonstrate that such gains are difficult to sustain.
Both LooksRare and X2Y2 introduced token incentives in early 2022. The excitement surrounding their airdrops was eventually overshadowed by prolonged token price declines. Initially, they failed to effectively capture a lasting share from OpenSea. Today, similar narratives persist but are less compelling.
Therefore, Blur must avoid complacency and focus on securing more tactical advantages.
Data from the first two months of 2023 shows that OpenSea’s number of unique buyers declined, and the average number of transactions per user also dropped. Meanwhile, Blur’s metrics rose. This indicates that a segment of NFT traders migrated from OpenSea to Blur, with higher average trading volumes on the latter—a clear result of Blur’s ongoing airdrop strategy.
It’s worth noting that although Blur has shown significant growth in trading volume and market share, the underlying details are less optimistic. According to Dune Analytics, over the past four months, about 15% of OpenSea’s trading volume came from eight blue-chip collections (CryptoPunks, BAYC, Otherdeed, MAYC, Meebits, Moonbirds, CloneX, and Doodles), while Blur derived approximately 41% of its trading volume from the same collections.
In other words, OpenSea’s trading volume is more healthily distributed, with the majority coming from mid- and long-tail works. Blur’s trading activity, however, is overly concentrated and heavily reliant on top-tier NFTs. This suggests that OpenSea still holds a significant advantage, supported by a large and diverse base of long-tail supply and demand.
👉 Explore advanced trading strategies
Concluding Thoughts
Blur’s story demonstrates that even in a persistently bearish crypto market, innovative teams can emerge with products that force industry leaders to stay vigilant or risk being overtaken.
That said, whether Blur can solidify its position and truly surpass OpenSea to bring a larger user base to the industry remains uncertain.
Web3 does not need more short-lived product-market fits, false dreams, or speculation-driven hype that eventually fizzles out. It needs genuine progress, promises fulfilled, and innovations that justify the industry’s potential. Blur, like others, still has a long way to go.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes Blur different from OpenSea?
Blur is designed specifically for professional traders, offering faster transaction speeds, advanced analytical tools, and a customizable interface. Unlike OpenSea, it currently charges zero transaction fees and aggregates orders from multiple marketplaces.
How did Blur manage to gain market share so quickly?
Blur used a multi-round airdrop strategy to incentivize users from other platforms. By rewarding past traders, active listers, and bidders, it attracted a significant user base seeking to capitalize on token distributions.
Can Blur sustain its growth without airdrops?
While airdrops provided an initial boost, long-term sustainability depends on retaining users through superior features and体验. Blur’s focus on trader-friendly tools and zero fees may help, but it must continue innovating to compete.
Does Blur support NFTs on blockchains other than Ethereum?
Currently, Blur only supports Ethereum-based NFTs. However, the team has announced plans to integrate other chains like Polygon in the future, which could expand its offerings.
Why is trading volume concentration a concern for Blur?
Over-reliance on blue-chip NFT collections makes Blur vulnerable to market shifts in a few high-value assets. A more diversified volume base, like OpenSea’s, indicates resilience and broader user interest.
What are the risks of using Blur?
As a relatively new platform, Blur may face technical or regulatory challenges. Users should also be aware that its professional interface might be overwhelming for beginners, and the dependency on incentives could affect long-term stability.