Perpetual contracts, often called "perps," are a cornerstone of cryptocurrency trading. They account for roughly two-thirds of all trading volume, with spot trading making up the remaining third. dYdX stands as one of the most prominent decentralized exchanges (DEX) for trading these perpetual contracts. With the upcoming launch of dYdX v4, the protocol is set to migrate to its own application-specific chain within the Cosmos ecosystem.
Unlike many DEXs that utilize an Automated Market Maker (AMM) model, dYdX employs a central limit order book (CLOB). This model is instantly familiar to traders from traditional finance, making the platform more accessible even to those new to crypto. This approach effectively combines the security and transparency of a DEX with the speed and user experience typically associated with centralized exchanges (CEX).
The Competitive Landscape of Perp DEXs
Founded in 2017, the dYdX protocol quickly gained popularity due to its deep liquidity, wide range of trading pairs, and a smooth, intuitive user interface. It has consistently dominated in terms of daily trading volume and active users. Notably, dYdX regularly captures over 70% of the total daily perpetual trading volume across all decentralized exchanges.
This substantial volume is converted into revenue through a maker-taker fee model. This model distinguishes between orders that provide liquidity ("maker" orders, which are limit orders not filled immediately) and orders that take liquidity ("taker" orders, which are market orders filled instantly). On dYdX, taker fees range from 0.2% to 0.5%, while maker fees are between 0% and -0.02% (often a rebate). These fees are tiered and decrease as a user's 30-day trading volume increases. Trades below $100,000 are fee-free.
Despite generating significant daily revenue, dYdX has often trailed its competitor, GMX, in terms of fees captured. GMX utilizes a different model, relying on liquidity pools where traders trade against the pool itself, rather than an order book. This can result in lower slippage for certain trades but often comes with limitations on overall liquidity and the number of available trading pairs. GMX employs a fixed fee structure of 0.1% to open and 0.1% to close a trade, plus small borrowing fees.
This higher fee structure, coupled with additional revenue from its spot trading feature, has often allowed GMX to generate higher daily revenues than dYdX, despite a lower trading volume. Together, dYdX and GMX account for approximately 70% of all revenue generated by DEXs.
Analyzing the dYdX Token Economics
A significant point of discussion and concern within the community has been the economic model of dYdX's native token, DYDX. The initial token distribution and vesting schedule have been a focal point.
A major token unlock was originally scheduled for early February, primarily for early investors, contributors, and advisors. This unlock was particularly notable because only about 23% of the total DYDX token supply is currently in circulation. The planned event would have nearly doubled the circulating supply overnight, creating potential selling pressure. In response to these concerns, the dYdX team announced a delay of this unlock until December 2023. This move provides time to consider alternative distribution methods that won't flood the market with new tokens.
Beyond the vesting schedule, other concerns include:
- Protocol revenue currently accrues to a private entity, dYdX Trading Inc., rather than to the protocol itself or to token holders.
- There is limited inherent utility and demand for the DYDX token in its current state.
Potential Pathways for Improvement
Simply delaying the token unlock does not solve the underlying economic challenges. Enhancing the token's value proposition is crucial, especially as the protocol prepares to migrate to its own Cosmos-based chain. In this new ecosystem, the value of the DYDX token becomes integral to network security, as its market capitalization contributes to the cost of attacking the network.
dYdX has already taken a monumental first step by announcing that all future protocol fees will be directed to stakers and validators on the new chain, rather than to dYdX Trading Inc. Building on this, several potential solutions could further increase the token's attractiveness.
1. Revising the Fee Structure
Trading on dYdX is already significantly cheaper than on many competitors—approximately 5x cheaper than GMX and 4x cheaper than platforms like Gains Network and MUX. Even a modest increase in fees could create a substantial new revenue stream for stakers. The existing maker-taker model allows for easy adjustments within its current tiers. A slight increase in taker fees could help fund staking rewards while still maintaining a competitive advantage. The platform's superior liquidity depth would help justify a small "decentralization premium," as evidenced by GMX's success despite higher fees.
2. Enhancing Transparency
The dYdX team could improve investor confidence through enhanced communication, particularly regarding the use of capital. It is not publicly clear how the nearly $400 million in cumulative fees earned by dYdX Trading Inc. has been allocated. Greater transparency on how these funds are being used to grow the protocol and ecosystem would be beneficial for token holder sentiment.
3. Expanding Service Offerings
GMX has demonstrated the popularity and revenue potential of built-in spot trading. GMX generates an average of approximately $200,000 in daily revenue from its spot feature alone. Integrating a similar native spot trading function, or partnering with a aggregation protocol to offer it and taking a fee share, could open a significant new revenue stream for the dYdX ecosystem.
4. Modifying the Token Unlock Schedule
Instead of large, cliff-style unlocks, the team could transition to a linear vesting schedule, where tokens are released daily or monthly over a set period. This would prevent a massive, sudden influx of liquidity into the market and alleviate sell pressure. While this requires amending legal agreements with investors, the recent decision to delay the unlock shows such coordination is possible.
5. Creating New Demand for the DYDX Token
With a large portion of the token supply yet to be released, creating new demand sinks is essential. Staking will be the primary demand driver on the new chain. However, additional utilities could be explored. For instance, fee discounts for users who stake or hold DYDX could be increased. This would directly incentivize holding and staking while simultaneously reducing the token's velocity—the speed at which it is traded.
👉 Explore advanced staking strategies
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main concern with the DYDX token?
The primary concern is its tokenomics, specifically the large portion of tokens still held by investors and team members that are not yet in circulation. This creates potential future selling pressure. Additionally, the token previously lacked utility, though this is changing with the v4 upgrade.
How does dYdX's fee model work?
dYdX uses a maker-taker model. Makers (those who place limit orders that provide liquidity) often receive a rebate, while takers (those who place market orders that take liquidity) pay a fee between 0.2% and 0.5%. Fees decrease for users with higher trading volumes.
What is dYdX v4?
dYdX v4 is a major upgrade where the protocol will migrate from its current layer-2 solution on Ethereum to its own, independent blockchain built using the Cosmos SDK. This move will make the protocol fully decentralized and community-owned.
Why is the token unlock important?
Token unlocks release large amounts of previously locked tokens to early investors, employees, and advisors. If these holders decide to sell their tokens, it can significantly increase the selling pressure on the market, potentially driving the price down.
How will the v4 upgrade improve tokenomics?
The most significant change is that all trading fees generated on the new chain will be distributed to stakers and validators, directly linking protocol revenue to the token and incentivizing users to stake their DYDX to earn a share.
Is dYdX competing with centralized exchanges?
Yes, absolutely. While it's a DEX, its order book model and user experience are designed to compete directly with major centralized exchanges like Binance. Its competitive advantages are self-custody, transparency, and decentralization.
Conclusion
dYdX is a top-tier decentralized trading platform with a leading market position. However, the economic model of its native token has faced justified scrutiny. By implementing thoughtful changes—such as redirecting fees to stakers, modifying vesting schedules, creating new token utilities, and enhancing transparency—the protocol can significantly strengthen its tokenomics. These improvements would make DYDX a more attractive investment, thereby securing the network and finally unlocking the full value of the underlying protocol for its community of token holders. The foundation for success is already there; now it's about optimizing the economic engine.